[QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']I see that the trend is this...'' I have a *insert a number from two to five here* year old computer and I can play half life 2 just fine but this new game crysis, i cant play it maxxed out...why the he!! not??'' If your gonna start off yoru threads starting anything resembling this just shut it! Ive never heard pc gamers gripe so much about an upgrade...did you expect that 7800 or x800 to last the rest of our life time or something? If you can get a playable framerate no matter what resolution this game is incredible. the amount of immersion puts a lot of other comparible games to shame. So enough of the ''my crappy computer cant max out crysis...so obviously it sux!'' threads. [/QUOTE] what about modern computers that cant run it as good as Cevat said? Most people are complaining about this, why they said a dual core and 8800 card would run it close to maxed out, while its currently not the case. Before you knock crysis....
[QUOTE=''greatmax1''][QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']I see that the trend is this...'' I have a *insert a number from two to five here* year old computer and I can play half life 2 just fine but this new game crysis, i cant play it maxxed out...why the he!! not??'' If your gonna start off yoru threads starting anything resembling this just shut it! Ive never heard pc gamers gripe so much about an upgrade...did you expect that 7800 or x800 to last the rest of our life time or something? If you can get a playable framerate no matter what resolution this game is incredible. the amount of immersion puts a lot of other comparible games to shame. So enough of the ''my crappy computer cant max out crysis...so obviously it sux!'' threads. [/QUOTE] what about modern computers that cant run it as good as Cevat said? Most people are complaining about this, why they said a dual core and 8800 card would run it close to maxed out, while its currently not the case. [/QUOTE]Exactly. I play the game on med/high with 8800 GTS, E6600 and 2gb to get playable performance.Maybe Crytek meant that we could max the game on 800x600.
once again...ur VERY uninformed. They never said you could max out crysis on modern hardware..thats the point. Thats why they said there is another year or so life in it. WOW...even in THIS thread someone is mad that they cant max out a game that they said you wouldnt be able to max out...this is funny. So i take it that almost everything on very high on yoru gtx and c2d isnt enough?
[QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']once again...ur VERY uninformed. They never said you could max out crysis on modern hardware..thats the point. Thats why they said there is another year or so life in it. WOW...even in THIS thread someone is mad that they cant max out a game that they said you wouldnt be able to max out...this is funny. So i take it that almost everything on very high on yoru gtx and c2d isnt enough?[/QUOTE] i suggest you go read some interviews of Cevart Yerli, he clearly says more than once that a dual core and 8800 would alsmot max out the game, but my setup along with a lot of other people cant even get playable framerates at med/high, wich isnt near maxed out. What do you expect, this game was hyped alot, crytek made promises they didnt keep, do you think no one will complain? If everyone just ignores the fact that they dont keep these said promises, companies will keep going this way....
Just defrag ur disk, clean your comp off virus.... Why should an E6400 with a 7900Gs and 1gb run as good as Maras if it isnt for that
Yerli said MANY MANY times that med/high is playable on this generations hardware...i think its a blessing that my gtx will play everything but shadows on Very High. Ive got an idea...since med/high isnt enough for you just stop playing pc games altogether....since you think you should be able to max out the newest game on an 8800 that is now a year old....sheesh...
I have a dual-core and an 8800 and I can almost max out the game... so I don't see how Crytek was lying...
agreed with post above. my e4400, 3 gigs of ram, GTX can run almost everythings on very high....once again why all the b!tching? upgrade or play i console i say...
i got a dual core/8800 the main thing seems to be having a dual core, most people complaining have single.Now dont shoot me but,....i didnt think the graphics were THAT great, i had em all maxxed and yah they were very good but they didnt blow me away, looked like quake4 had a baby with far cry....Demo was ALRIGHT, wasnt mind blowing.
Still downloading it, but I'll just say that I don't really understand how people seem happy with getting 25fps @1024x768. If any other game performed like that it would be universally bashed by everyone, but maybe there's something in Crysis that separates it from the rest of the pack, I just hope that something isn't hype.
[QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']agreed with post above. my e4400, 3 gigs of ram, GTX can run almost everythings on very high....once again why all the b!tching? upgrade or play i console i say...[/QUOTE] of course, youre another of these people that arent bothered by low fps, mainly because they usually play on console and are used to low framerates... You max it out, but probably at 1024*768 at 20fps.
[QUOTE=''greatmax1''][QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']I see that the trend is this...'' I have a *insert a number from two to five here* year old computer and I can play half life 2 just fine but this new game crysis, i cant play it maxxed out...why the he!! not??'' If your gonna start off yoru threads starting anything resembling this just shut it! Ive never heard pc gamers gripe so much about an upgrade...did you expect that 7800 or x800 to last the rest of our life time or something? If you can get a playable framerate no matter what resolution this game is incredible. the amount of immersion puts a lot of other comparible games to shame. So enough of the ''my crappy computer cant max out crysis...so obviously it sux!'' threads. [/QUOTE] what about modern computers that cant run it as good as Cevat said? Most people are complaining about this, why they said a dual core and 8800 card would run it close to maxed out, while its currently not the case. [/QUOTE]I have a 8800 , 2GB RAM , Q6600 and run nearlyt everything on Very High ( I turn post processing down because of motion sickness) at 1650 x 1050 ... Cevat was dead on the mark imo.
[QUOTE=''Meu2k7''] [QUOTE=''greatmax1''][QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']I see that the trend is this...'' I have a *insert a number from two to five here* year old computer and I can play half life 2 just fine but this new game crysis, i cant play it maxxed out...why the he!! not??'' If your gonna start off yoru threads starting anything resembling this just shut it! Ive never heard pc gamers gripe so much about an upgrade...did you expect that 7800 or x800 to last the rest of our life time or something? If you can get a playable framerate no matter what resolution this game is incredible. the amount of immersion puts a lot of other comparible games to shame. So enough of the ''my crappy computer cant max out crysis...so obviously it sux!'' threads. [/QUOTE] what about modern computers that cant run it as good as Cevat said? Most people are complaining about this, why they said a dual core and 8800 card would run it close to maxed out, while its currently not the case. [/QUOTE]I have a 8800 , 2GB RAM , Q6600 and run nearlyt everything on Very High ( I turn post processing down because of motion sickness) at 1650 x 1050 ... Cevat was dead on the mark imo.[/QUOTE] this is a quad by the way... and what kind of fps?
For people that are wondering why their computer won't run Crysis, The key seems to be in dual core, just like Colin Mcrae DIRT. New games are optomized for Dual Core, and run very well. Even with my older Radeon X1600 pro I could play Colin Mcrae with everything but Shadows on high. I have an Athlon X2 4200+, Radeon X1950 pro 512mb, 2GB ram, and I can play the game at 1024x768 with three options (NO AA):1) Everything on high except for post Processing on Med and Shaders on MediumOR 2) Everything on high except Post Processing on Med and Shadows on Med. OR3) Everything on high at 800x600 (but I like 1024x768, crisper)Either Shadows or Shaders down to Med gives me a big FPS boost. I'm getting between25-35 FPS.it looks like a great game, Far Cry with some twists. For those people that say the view distance is huge, so was Far Cry's, just because the view distance is huge, doesn't mean the game is gonna run like a slug, if you look at the resolution of far away textures and trees, you'll see a big difference from what's close (obviously).
For people that are wondering why their computer won't run Crysis, The key seems to be in dual core, just like Colin Mcrae DIRT. New games are optomized for Dual Core, and run very well. Even with my olderRadeon X1600 pro I could play Colin Mcrae with everything but Shadows on high.I have an Athlon X2 4200+, Radeon X1950 pro 512mb, 2GB ram, and I can play the game at 1024x768 withthree options (NO AA):1) Everything on high except for post Processing on Med and Shaders on MediumOR 2)Everything on high except Post Processing on Med and Shadows on Med. OR3) Everything on high at 800x600 (but I like 1024x768, crisper)Either Shadows or Shaders down to Med gives me a big FPS boost. it looks like a great game, Far Cry with some twists. For those people that say the view distance is huge, so was Far Cry's, just because the view distance is huge, doesn't mean the game is gonna run like a slug, if you look at the resolution of far away textures and trees, you'll see a big difference from what's close (obviously).
After installing the Beta driver and over clocking to 3.2 I have no trouble playing with all setting on high. CD2 E6750@3.2,2GB XMS C4 and 2x BFG 8800GTS OC2(will not run in SLI) in XP at 1440x900. I haven't tried Vista yet.
i got dual core 2.4 6600 with an old 6600 gts !! and 2ddr1(..)But i can run the game smoothly but the graphics suffer!!!
[QUOTE=''Meu2k7''] [QUOTE=''greatmax1''][QUOTE=''31337r4v3n'']I see that the trend is this...'' I have a *insert a number from two to five here* year old computer and I can play half life 2 just fine but this new game crysis, i cant play it maxxed out...why the he!! not??'' If your gonna start off yoru threads starting anything resembling this just shut it! Ive never heard pc gamers gripe so much about an upgrade...did you expect that 7800 or x800 to last the rest of our life time or something? If you can get a playable framerate no matter what resolution this game is incredible. the amount of immersion puts a lot of other comparible games to shame. So enough of the ''my crappy computer cant max out crysis...so obviously it sux!'' threads. [/QUOTE] what about modern computers that cant run it as good as Cevat said? Most people are complaining about this, why they said a dual core and 8800 card would run it close to maxed out, while its currently not the case. [/QUOTE]I have a 8800 , 2GB RAM , Q6600 and run nearlyt everything on Very High ( I turn post processing down because of motion sickness) at 1650 x 1050 ... Cevat was dead on the mark imo.[/QUOTE]Is Very High even an option? On my Graphics settings, Very High is greyed out.
tsk tsk, here we go again.A company releases a game that requires more engine power then whats currently available and they get shunted, to say it nicely.I think i've scanned some 100 pages of Crysis degrading material and i've yet to see anyone compare this to the release of Doom 3. When Doom 3 was released you needed a topped out Alienware ALX station to play that on max, now aday's you can throw it over your shoulder with a 7900GTX.No one has commended Crytek(sorry, no honor for EA on this, you suck!) on the job they've accomplished. They've once again ventured a digital freakin' minefield to come out with something that would set the bar (yet again) for games. I've yet to see a single person stop up and think; ''Hey' a year from now we'll all be playing this on Very High with low/Mid range machines, and it'll still floor anything that'll be on the market by that time''. Sure we can't play it on very high, or even high for many of us, but you fellas know what, the game looks fantastic on just medium settings. There will come a time where everyone will be looking back on this game and thinking how it really changed games as we know them.
No comments:
Post a Comment