im running on q6600, 2 gig ram, 8800 gtx 640mb..and still cant get very high detail without a low frame rate...runs nicely at high detail...is this the norm?okay demo...but still think bioshock blows it away at first glane(game wise).oh 64bit vista.got crysis running 64bit/dx10 but........
well I do know that 4 gig ram is highly recommended now by most game publishers for not only Vista but 64-bit especially.got crysis running 64bit/dx10 but........
Not overly surprising. Basically high is where the GTX is suggested. From what i am seeing it looks like SLI might do very high. The question i guess is what did they put into very high. Perhaps it's using crazy textures and such that the current cards can't do. Doom3 did that as well. Very high could only be properly done with recent video card even though it's rather old because it required 512mb of vram. I don't have vista 64bit to compare but that's a possibility
hhhmmm...i thought the 8800 gtx was the best you could get..with the exception of the ultra version:(i was gonna upgrade to 4 gig..but cyberpowerpc advised it might negatively affect my gaming performance..LOL!!! spot the noob:)))hey ho...the game still looks the nuts! at least i can play in high detail i guess:)))Thanks for the feedback!!
[QUOTE=''karmageddon2k4'']Not overly surprising. Basically high is where the GTX is suggested. From what i am seeing it looks like SLI might do very high. The question i guess is what did they put into very high. Perhaps it's using crazy textures and such that the current cards can't do. Doom3 did that as well. Very high could only be properly done with recent video card even though it's rather old because it required 512mb of vram. I don't have vista 64bit to compare but that's a possibility[/QUOTE]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment